14 questions from actual SSC GD Constable papers · all shown free · click option to reveal solution
A conclusion is valid only if it follows logically and directly from the given statement. You cannot use outside knowledge or assumptions beyond what is explicitly stated
First, read the statement carefully and understand what it says. Second, analyze each conclusion independently. Third, check if the conclusion uses information not present in the statement. Fourth, avoid bringing your personal knowledge into the analysis.
Fifth, look for absolute terms like 'all', 'some', 'no', 'only' as they change meaning significantly.
SSC CGL typically asks 2-3 questions on this topic. Questions usually have one statement with two conclusions labeled I and II. You must choose from options like 'Only I follows', 'Only II follows', 'Both follow', or 'Neither follows'.
Use the 'Circle Method'. Circle key words in the statement like 'all', 'some', 'only'. Then check if the conclusion uses the same scope.
If the statement says 'some students' but conclusion says 'all students', it's invalid.
Analyze the statement. We know all roses belong to the flower category, and some flowers have the red property.
Check Conclusion I. The statement tells us all roses are flowers, and some flowers are red. But it doesn't tell us which flowers are red. The red flowers could be roses or other flowers. We cannot conclude all roses are red. This is INVALID.
Check Conclusion II. Since the statement clearly says 'All roses are flowers', it automatically means some roses are also flowers. This is VALID. Answer: Only conclusion II follows. Second Shortcut: For 'Some' statements, remember that 'some' means 'at least one but not necessarily all'. If statement says 'Some dogs bark', it means at least one dog barks, but other dogs might not bark.
Students often apply real-world knowledge instead of sticking to the given statement. For example, if the statement is 'All birds can fly' and conclusion is 'Penguins can fly', students know penguins cannot fly in reality. But based purely on the statement logic, if penguins are birds and all birds can fly, then penguins can fly according to the given information.
Always work within the statement's framework, not real-world facts.