Question 1

Statements:
1. All flowers are plants.
2. Some plants are green.

Conclusion: Either all flowers are green, or no flowers are green.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the student's ability to evaluate an 'Either/Or' conclusion against syllogistic premises. The Either/Or format is a common easy-difficulty trap where students must recognize that neither extreme conclusion is warranted.

Question 2

Statements:
1. All poets are creative.
2. No creative people are lazy.

Conclusion: No poets are lazy.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the student's ability to apply the transitive property of exclusion: if all members of one class belong to a second class, and the second class is excluded from a third, then the first class is also excluded from the third.

Question 3

Statements:
1. Some athletes are disciplined.
2. All disciplined people are successful.

Conclusion: Some athletes are successful.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the student's ability to trace a valid logical path through a middle term. The middle term 'disciplined' is properly distributed, allowing a valid conclusion about the overlap between athletes and successful people.

Question 4

Statements:
1. All teachers are educated.
2. Some educated people are doctors.

Conclusion: Some doctors are teachers.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This is a classic syllogism testing whether students can identify invalid conclusions from valid premises. The two premises do not establish a logical link between 'doctors' and 'teachers' because 'educated people' is the middle term that appears in both premises but does not create a valid bridge.

Question 5

Statements:
1. No reptiles are mammals.
2. All snakes are reptiles.

Conclusion: No snakes are mammals.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the student's ability to apply the basic syllogistic rule: if all members of a class belong to another class, and that class is excluded from a third, then the first class is also excluded from the third.

Question 6

Statements:
1. All athletes are disciplined.
2. Some disciplined people are not successful.
3. All successful people are confident.

Conclusions:
I. Some athletes are not successful.
II. Some disciplined people are not confident.
III. Either all athletes are successful or some athletes are not successful.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the ability to distinguish between valid and invalid particular conclusions, and to evaluate either/or statements in syllogistic reasoning.

Question 7

Statements:
1. All teachers are educated professionals.
2. Some educated professionals are not motivators.

Conclusions:
I. Some teachers are not motivators.
II. All teachers are motivators.

Which of the following is true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the ability to distinguish between valid and invalid conclusions from mixed universal and particular premises.

Question 8

Statements:
1. No politician is trustworthy.
2. All judges are trustworthy.
3. Some lawyers are politicians.

Conclusions:
I. Some lawyers are not judges.
II. All judges are lawyers.

Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Accepted Answer

This tests the ability to work with negative universal premises and derive valid conclusions about overlapping categories.

Question 9

Statements:
1. All doctors are professionals.
2. No professional is unemployed.
3. Some graduates are unemployed.

Conclusions:
I. Some graduates are not professionals.
II. No doctor is unemployed.
III. Some doctors are graduates.

Which conclusion(s) must be true?

Accepted Answer

This tests the ability to work with negative universal premises and avoid invalid transitive reasoning with particular statements.

Question 10

Statements:
1. All engineers are problem-solvers.
2. No problem-solvers are complacent.
3. Some managers are engineers.

Which of the following conclusions is/are definitely true?
I. Some managers are not complacent.
II. All managers are problem-solvers.
III. No managers are complacent.

Accepted Answer

This question tests chaining of syllogisms with 'All' and 'No' statements, and distinguishing between 'some' and 'all' in conclusions.

Question 11

Statements:
1. All innovators are risk-takers.
2. Some risk-takers are not successful.
3. No unsuccessful people are confident.
4. Some employees are innovators.

Which of the following conclusions is/are definitely true?
I. Some employees are risk-takers.
II. Some risk-takers are not confident.
III. Either all innovators are successful or some innovators are not successful.

Accepted Answer

This four-statement hard syllogism tests chaining with negations and evaluates an Either/Or conclusion that requires understanding logical exhaustiveness.

Question 12

Statements:
1. All philosophers are critical thinkers.
2. Some critical thinkers are not logicians.
3. No logicians are poets.

Which of the following conclusions is/are definitely true?
I. Some philosophers are not logicians.
II. Some poets are not critical thinkers.
III. All critical thinkers are philosophers.

Accepted Answer

This question tests the ability to derive valid conclusions from three-statement syllogisms with mixed quantifiers and negations.

Question 13

Statements:
1. All researchers are analytical.
2. No analytical people are impulsive.
3. Some employees are researchers.
4. All impulsive people are creative.

Which of the following conclusions is/are definitely true?
I. Some employees are not impulsive.
II. Some creative people are not analytical.
III. All researchers are creative.

Accepted Answer

This four-statement syllogism tests chaining across multiple premises and distinguishing valid from invalid conclusions with negations.

IBPS Clerk Syllogism

IBPS Clerk Syllogism — Past Exam Questions

Syllogism— Rules & Concept

Key Points to Remember

Exam-Specific Tips

60-Second Revision — Syllogism